The court of Nova Gorica is the family of the deceased Stevo Petrović, who died of lung cancer after a pulmonologist treated him with antibiotics in Šempeter Hospital for one year, paid 50,000 euros in compensation.
The court of Nova Gorica judged that an unreasonable professional mistake was made, reports Primorske beginners and television Slovenija. The deceased's relatives are from General Hospital Dr. Franc Derganc of Šempeter Pri Gorici demanded a good compensation of 354 000 euros and the court was awarded SEK 50 000. It is clear from the judgment that Petrović's treatment was negligent, unprofessional and contrary to the medical profession's rules and thus illegal reports from the Primorski Novice website.
In civil proceedings, the Novogorica District Court granted the basis for justice in its entirety and in the judgment, which states, inter alia, that on the basis of the proven procedure, applicants' claims for damages were granted on the basis of, but not entirely, in the amount.
Relatives: For us this means moral satisfaction
"After five years of suffering we received a verdict that it is clear that the treatment of the deceased father at Šempeter Hospital is contrary to the medical profession, superficially and negligently. This is primarily a moral satisfaction for us, otherwise we have already said this from the beginning and We have also been able to prove it all the time. We have also been warned that it is not acceptable for a single pulmonologist to work in the lung department and within one year of treatment, none of the consultants who treated the deceased father "
Primorska novine summarizes the statement of the daughter of the late Polona Petrović.
Criminal proceedings are also ongoing
Criminal proceedings against Petrović's pulmonologist are also ongoing in the court of Novo Brdo
who has been accused of abusing the patient between June 2012 and May 2013 due to an inflammatory disease of the lungs and overlooking a deadly cancer at the end of 2013.
The doctor rejects the complaint. Birtic and the hospital claimed that the patient was in an unfavorable set of unfortunate circumstances and facts and that they acted in accordance with a medical doctrine. So far, several witnesses have been present, and at the end of October she spoke among other things
who drafted an expert opinion to Šempeter Hospital, assessing that a medical error occurred during treatment.
"An error can occur during treatment, which is no crime at all"
pointed out at the beginning of the explanation of her expert opinion. She expressed the belief that a systemic error occurred in the treatment of Petrović.