Sunday , October 2 2022

Room wants to investigate a slower AOW age NOW



[ad_1]

The government must investigate whether the state's retirement age can still rise with expected life expectancy from 2022. The coalition parties CDA, VVD, D66 and ChristenUnie, together with opposition parties GroenLinks, PvdA and SGP, agreed on this during a debate on the failed pension agreement on Tuesday evening. .

The vast majority of Parliament wants the government to look at what is a "reasonable relationship" between the number of years worked and the number of retirement years, taking into account the health of workers and affordable costs for the government.

Previously, it was agreed to raise the age of AOW for 67 years and then link one to one to life. This means that employees have to work for a year longer if the Dutch live on average a year longer.

Based on this, the state's retirement age is set at 67 years and three months in 2024, but the parties now question this link.

Debate was mainly about failed pension agreements

It is a small victory in a debate that was mainly about the failed pension agreement last week. Employees and employers have negotiated negotiated for seven years to change the retirement scheme that they have saved. Although AOW is paid by the state, the state pension has been included in the discussion.

Parliament discussed this with Prime Minister Mark Rutte and Minister Wouter Koolmees (Social Affairs) about failed talks. Cabinet members have negotiated with social partners in recent weeks.

There is no clear picture of what needs to be done now. "There is no pension agreement, so what's next? Asked GreenLink leader Jesse Klaver Checked after five hours of debate.

It is possible that ten million pensions need to be reduced due to the absence of a new pension scheme 2020 and 2021.

Piano received no response, because there is no clear way. Koolmees and Rutte just wanted to tell where things went wrong in their eyes. "We were almost out," Rutte said. "It was a broad agreement between employees and employers," agreed Koolmees. The official position is that the government will consider the next step.

Consultation collapsed to raise AOW age

Last Tuesday, the consultation between employees and employers gathered to reach a pension agreement. In particular, FNV, by far the largest union, was accused of bringing additional demands at the last minute.

The link between the government's retirement age and life expectancy was one of these requirements. For the union it is important that employees with heavy occupations can stop working earlier.

Although Rutte has sympathy for that wish, he says he can not finance it. The costs increase to around EUR 6 billion. Every year again. "You can not ask such a quantity from a cupboard. It's not democratic," said the prime minister.

Trade unions and the Cabinet agreed on a number of other important points. For example, the state retirement age would only increase to 67 in 2024 instead of 2021. The government was also prepared to reduce the fine on early retirement and even cancel it for one year.

They were commitments that were needed in the hope that the pension system could be renewed. The current system no longer fits with this labor market with more and more self-employed and employees who often change employers.

Great Tit warned that older people are angry because their retirement has not been indexed for several years. He also said that more and more young people do not want to participate, because they are afraid there will be no money for them in the pot. The support for a system that young and old is responsible for threatens to disappear, according to the minister.

No support for compulsory ZZP pension

Plaver asked more attention for the compulsory pension savings for 1.6 million self-employed workers. Employers, who have to spend the prizes and employees, did not agree. "We want to instruct employers to pay premiums for people who actually connect them," says GreenLinks leader.

The coalition and the cabinet see nothing in such an obligation, they want to make a self-employed pension more attractive and tempt people to participate.

PvdA leader Lodewijk Asscher was particularly disappointed at how much the government had for a new pension system. The cabinet had put € 7 billion on the table for the next fifteen years, but 'only' 200 million euros was structural.

The PvdA leader called on the government to return to the negotiating table with a bigger money. SP leader Lilian Marijnissen also felt that the government had offered too little, but the party leaders did not hear.

VVD implies agreement without trade unions

VVD played with the idea of ​​entering into a pension agreement without the workers' organizations. "I can hardly explain that we have pension negotiations conducted by unions representing only a few percent of the workers," said VDD member Roald van der Linde.

It puts bad blood on some opposition parties. "The unions have more members than all political parties together," Marijnissen told him.

But Van der Linde maintained that the unions had too much power given the limited supporters. According to Statistics Finland (CBS), about 1.7 million people were members of a trade union last year, the lowest number that has been measured since the beginning of the nineties.

VVD's contribution remarkably enough on Route's small approval bill. The Prime Minister acknowledged the importance of the trade union movement. He also denies that trade unions would negotiate on behalf of too few people. "About 70 percent of employees can be found in the collective agreement of the so-called unrepresented trade union."

"The Bid Is Still Left"

One thing agreed to all parties in the House: The failure to enter into a pension agreement is a missed opportunity.

"The bid is still there," said Koolmees on D66's question if the government is prepared to continue talking. "There's a call, my phone is almost always on", according to the minister.

He was looking forward to the public gallery where Tuur Elzinga (Vice Chairman FNV), Arend van Wijngaarden (Vice-President CNV) and Nic Holstein (Chairman of the VCP) followed the debate.

[ad_2]
Source link